If I had to guess, I would say 80-90% of the men and women I
work with every day have at some point in their life possessed a weapon. In their world, a gun (or multiple guns)
carry a three-pronged value. They
provide protection when carrying out illegal activities; they provide a way to scare/attack/revenge/teach
other “players in the game” who may need
to be dealt with; they very rarely (though
it does of course happen) are used to scare innocent people who may be the
victim of a theft, car jacking or burglary.
Interestingly, I’ve found that those who commit these sorts of crimes
rarely, if ever, WANT to use violent force, they just want to scare the victim
but sometimes feel their hand is forced when things spiral out of control. Violence, it seems, is reserved for those who
are in the game.
In this world, guns are usually obtained illegally and gun control laws mean little. It is this world that those who are against
tighter restrictions like to talk about: the violence of Chicago, Detroit, DC,
for example. Here’s the problem with
that argument: the majority of this violence they quote is young black man
against young black man. The gun
violence of these cities is overwhelmingly confined to the urban ghetto, not
the pristine suburbs. Of course this is
not the whole story, but it is a hefty, hefty piece of it.
In this world, violence stems from the game that is played,
an unwillingness to be “disrespected”, a desire to protect one’s turf, product
or reputation. Most of the perpetrators
would say that the victim had it coming by something they did, said or took.
Then there is the world of mass murder, like the disgustingly
horrific tragedy in Connecticut. According
to the Washington Post, of the sixty-one mass murders that have taken place in
the last twenty years, the guns that have been used have been legally obtained in nearly 50 of the
incidents. The demographics of the
shooters are different, the shooters usually being described as
socially-awkward, isolated, troubled individuals, many with a history of some
sort of mental illness.
The perpetrators of the first world look at the perpetrators
of the second world with the same disgust as you and I do. They would never, ever think of walking into
a movie theater, school room or other gathering of people and shoot
randomly. That’s not how they play the
game. I know, because I talk with them
every day.
So I’m left to believe that to compare the two worlds- and think that policy decisions to deal with
them are the same- is so very, very wrong.
The first perpetrators described need help learning how to
manage anger, to feel and believe they have value outside of their
reputation. They need more economic
opportunity, better school systems, stronger family support structures. Would tighter gun control laws help? Maybe, but probably not.
The second perpetrators described most often need
psychological help, pro-socialization support, a place to be heard and
understood in a world that they feel is out to get them. More resources spent on researching the human
brain, on best practices of dealing with psychological disorders, better
monitoring and better testing. Would
tighter gun control laws help? Maybe,
but probably yes.
I am sickened by what happened in Connecticut. It is, to be frank, evil. I am also sickened that this country is
losing so many young, black men to gun violence every single day. We, as a country, have to do something about both
situations, to have the hard conversations about gun control, yes, but also
about better schools, better economic opportunity, better psychological
support, less violent media, and so on and so on. May we be brave enough to do so.
No comments:
Post a Comment